- – – – -
Though I aim for this site to cover all forms of pop music, sometimes I let real guilty-pleasure bubblegum too easily slip through the cracks. Mandy Barry’s music clearly aims for the top 40 radio aesthetic, with a sound akin to early Rihanna, before “Umbrella” made her a household name. Having heard two of Barry’s songs (the other being the four-to-the-floor Britney-esque club track “Girl Break Up”) it’s clear she’s got an ear for hooks.
What she doesn’t have is a producer with a deft touch. It’s a shame “Second to Breathe,” which overall is her strongest single, doesn’t take its own title’s advice. The overwhelming mix drowns a hook-laden, keyboard-heavy hook in tribal percussion and broadly-defined synth touches — the song, though solid, can’t completely shine through the mess. There’s a great deal of pop potential here if she takes the time to focus on stripping these pop tracks down to their strongest elements. Each track is worth a listen to hear what pop hit-makers sound like before they get their big break and the studio opportunities and advice which frequently come with such. Mandy Barry’s not all the way there yet, but I like her chances.
I really wanted to hate this song when I saw that the New York Post dubbed Neon Hitch as an A-List female pop queen and that Idolator called her a sexy singer songwriter despite the fact that her hit is produced by the same guy who produces Ke$ha, Britney Spears and Katy Perry. It’s clear the hype machine wants to make sure Neon Hitch is the 2011 answer to Lady Gaga now that Gaga has played out her crazy-as-batshit stage reputation for all its worth, leaving nothing but her new music behind (and look how disappointing that was, my friends).
The problem is, as much issue as I take with this kind of electro-pop music being considered “singer-songwriter” in any sense of the phrase, this is definitely an addictive piece of dance pop, and it’s all but certain to tear up the charts, since it plays to everything top 40 radio adores these days. I”m not sold on the idea that Neon Hitch has anything else up her sleeve but this one potential Britney-aping confection. And the “bad dog, let me punish you” fetishism of the lyrics becomes cloying the more you hear it. But the song’s catchy as hell and once you do hear it you won’t get it out of your head, which is why in a few months you won’t be able to escape singing along with the chorus.
I wanted to hate this song like a vengeance, and by the end of 2011 I probably will. Which is why I’m glad I at least got to hear it before top 40 radio makes it impossible not to despise it. I do hope, however, that there’s something more to Neon Hitch than a great backstory and this one pop track that is here today, gone tomorrow. We’ll find out when she drops her debut album Beg, Borrow and Steal later this year.
Enough with irresponsible music criticism! Stop making allegations of plagiarism where it doesn’t exist!
Britney Spears might not hold it against them, but the Bellamy Brothers have decided to rise up from obscurity to claim that Ms. Spears misappropriated their lyrics to create her newest soon-to-be-hit single, “Hold It Against Me.” They claim she took her song’s chorus directly from their song “If I Said You Had A Beautiful Body” — a line they acknowledge they borrowed from Groucho Marx. To quote a recent article on Yahoo’s “Our Country” blog, apparently there are some idiots out there who take this crass grab for attention by the Bellamys seriously. Writes Chris Willman:
“It’s probably true that anyone under 30 who doesn’t come from a country-loving family has never heard the phrase before. But certainly almost anyone over 35 or 40 has, and not even just country fans, thanks to the title’s ubiquity in popular culture in the early ’80s.
“It may not count as plagiarism, but even after a few decades, you’re still kind of surprised that anyone would have the chutzpah to go there. For anyone in middle age or older, hearing a song with that as its lyric hook, it’s as if someone wrote a new song called ‘(I Don’t Have Any) Satisfaction’ or “Janey Got a Glock” or ‘Hi, Jude.'”
I’m calling bullshit on the whole thing. For one, the Bellamys’ song is hardly as ubiquitous as Willman would like to believe. Second, compare the lyrics in question from the Bellamys’ song:
“If I said you had a beautiful body, would you hold it against me?
If I swore you were an angel, would you treat me like the devil tonight?
If I were dying of thirst, would your flowing love come quench me?
If I said you had a beautiful body, would you hold it against me?”
to the lyrics from Britney’s chorus:
“If I said my heart was beating loud
If we could escape the crowd somehow
If I said I want your body now
Would you hold it against me?
Cause you feel like paradise
I need a vacation tonight
So if I said I want your body now
Would you hold it against me?”
As far as I can tell, the only offense Ms. Spears committed was daring to use a line, “would you hold it against me?” that references sex, something I can’t imagine has never been done before. To expect that no one else was ever going to use the Bellamys’ lame pick-up line, which they admit came from Groucho Marx, is absurd. And for Willman to contend that this is akin to rewriting “Hey Jude” as “Hi Jude” is disingenuous at best.
Let’s be honest. I’m all for holding artists accountable. When Vanilla Ice rewrote “Under Pressure” by Queen and added a few new notes to mask the misappropriation, that was infringement. When Huey Lewis’s “I Want A New Drug” was turned into the Ghostbusters theme without his permission (again with a few notes modified) that was worthy of exposure in the press. But Britney’s new single is nothing like the Bellamys’ 1979 single. The tone of both songs is completely different, and the lyrics differ significantly aside from the use of the “hold it against me” phrase.
And if we’re going to get that nitpicky as to bring up Katy Perry’s “California Gurls” (vs. the Beach Boys’ “California Girls”) or “I Kissed A Girl” (vs. Jill Sobule’s original), as Willman does later in the same article, then why not target everyone who’s ever used the same title as another singer? You can’t copyright a song title. Which is why we can have “Ghost Train” by Marc Cohn, “Ghost Train” by Counting Crows, and “Ghost Train” by Gorillaz, none of which come even close to being the same song! And why not bring in Dottie West’s “Would You Hold It Against Me?” which actually predates the Bellamys’ hit by 13 years? Sure, it’s using the phrase in a completely different context (“would you hold it against me if I see him one more time?”) but why should we let context into the equation?
Bottom line — even beyond song titles, you can’t copyright a popular idiom, and to ride Britney Spears’ coattails with a bogus accusation seems beyond pointless. But I really took affront to the idea that because Britney grew up in the south, she should have known the song was misappropriated:
“There does seem to be a bit of a pattern emerging in the Dr. Luke/Max Martin camp, where everything old is new again, when it comes to appropriating familiar old titles or lyrical hooks. Dr. Luke has said in interviews that he’s not that much of a lyric guy, so it seems entirely likely that Katy Perry was responsible for borrowing those earlier titles—and that Britney had this one pop into her head, after almost certain exposure to it growing up in the South.”
The author’s sarcasm is duly noted. But the ridiculous argument implies that Britney heard the Bellamys’ song, decided to use the line for her own song and not credit them appropriately, and that it’s part of some grand conspiracy to make old songs new again. Nevermind the fact that, even if Britney had heard the song before, the two songs aren’t similar enough to imply intellectual property theft — which is exactly what Yahoo does with their blaring headline: “Does Britney’s “Hold It Against Me” Rip Off the Bellamy Brothers?”
This sort of thing has happened before, with Michael Jackson’s posthumous release featuring Akon, “Hold My Hand,” leading to Hootie and the Blowfish’s “Hold My Hand” being dredged up to suggest that the MJ single somehow “ripped off” the Blowfish. Yahoo wrote a big bullshit article on the subject under the headline: “Michael Jackson and Akon Get Hootie-esque and Hold Hands on New Single.” This, despite there being a Sean Paul song with the same title, not to mention “Hold My Hand” by Nat King Cole, “Hold My Hand” from the musical Me and My Girl, “Hold My Hand” by New Found Glory, and … what the hell … “I Wanna Hold Your Hand” by the Beatles. Enough for you?
It seems far more likely that whoever wrote the song for Spears took a familiar idiom, “would you hold it against me?” and crafted a dubstep sex romp for Britney Spears to make her 2011 comeback. No hidden agendas, just pop music. And the sooner veteran musicians stop “crying theft” to get attention, the better. And bloggers need to be responsible enough not to make comparisons that don’t hold water, only to drum up a few click-throughs. We’ve all had more than enough!
Hear for yourself — the two choruses are broken out here:
Britney is back and her new single is destined to be the addictive brain-takeover song of the new year … thanks to music leaks, that is (though I can’t imagine her label wouldn’t want the world to hear the song early and realize that Britney’s back and ready to create hook-filled pop again rather than tabloid headlines). Now we’ve got to wait for the inevitable Glee remix.
(Link courtesy of The Prophet Blog)